tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2949964747410221992.post2736294302116232080..comments2024-03-26T02:35:07.114-07:00Comments on A Slice of Mind: Myers-Briggs Personality Test, What is your personality type?Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13876754891701386069noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2949964747410221992.post-72969318576051061512013-09-14T23:05:02.204-07:002013-09-14T23:05:02.204-07:00Thanks, Suva, for this posting, it was good to be ...Thanks, Suva, for this posting, it was good to be reminded of this and to re-assess my personality type.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17420029088809696342noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2949964747410221992.post-91494459632524735612013-04-29T06:07:57.812-07:002013-04-29T06:07:57.812-07:00Forer effect... there's a name for it!
As I d...Forer effect... there's a name for it!<br /><br />As I discovered today when comparing MBTI to Keirsey's Temperament Sorter the essential classification system extends as far back as 590 BC. Perhaps you've come across some of these: <br />http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keirsey_Temperament_Sorter#Historical_development<br /><br />While those are useful questions Suva raises, I suspect human behaviour is governed by far more than personality. It's interesting to note the difference between Keirseys and Myers sytstems for example:<br />http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keirsey_Temperament_Sorter#Myers-Briggs_types_versus_Keirsey.27s_temperamentsEin~+einhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11095408278627252919noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2949964747410221992.post-77852569947844071082013-04-06T22:54:43.009-07:002013-04-06T22:54:43.009-07:00Interesting; I did the MBTI years ago and discover...Interesting; I did the MBTI years ago and discovered I was an INTJ but haven't thought about it much since. Renee, do you think there is any correlation between any of these dichotomies - e.g. extraversion/intraversion (E/I) or thinking/feeling (T/F) - and religiosity?Les Bellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08210607019359651470noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2949964747410221992.post-15832880459826342752013-04-04T22:46:30.667-07:002013-04-04T22:46:30.667-07:00I uderstand were you are going with this. Yes I&#...I uderstand were you are going with this. Yes I'm a introverted. But that is general. Specifics is what concern me on such things. We are both feelers and thinkers. The question is how much of one compared to the other. Some people are more one than the other but it would be an easy mistake for people to think that they are only one (which, I think, many people don't realise). James Randi says that stage magic teach two lessons. 1)How to fool others and 2)how to fool youself. The second is much more important. You can be completly honest with youself on which type you are. Then you can show someone else your results and they can point out something about you that is the opposite. You are both thinker and feeler. You are probably more of a feeler based on your upbringing but the the thinker part of you is still growing when you started reading and learning the opposite side and thought about it. I think that this test is a good way to understand the general side of your personality. Specifics on the other hand would need to be done more more questions in each basic catagory. johnsuttonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04548989640535234663noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2949964747410221992.post-62345382830461998932013-04-04T21:47:55.465-07:002013-04-04T21:47:55.465-07:00Thank you for sharing this with me John. I always ...Thank you for sharing this with me John. I always thought you were an introvert based on your posts and your videos. I also think you are a little mix of a couple of those--then again, since we've only interacted online, I couldn't really say.<br /><br />Hahaha!:) Well, yes, read about the various types and see which one of them fits you the best. I know that I do really well with INTJ's. When doing the test, I made sure to be extremely, extremely honest in my answers (I wanted to be a thinker and not a feeler) but the results showed that I was, in fact, a feeler. One of the things that I found really interesting was the fact that sensers tend to relate well with other sensers and intuiters tend to relate well with other intuiters. One of the articles made it sound like this was one of the major determinants of good relationships (being with someone of your type in the sensing/intuiting category.) Sorry for how rash this response was...Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13876754891701386069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2949964747410221992.post-16388558010668892162013-04-04T19:54:45.101-07:002013-04-04T19:54:45.101-07:00Interesting. I can apprciate this more than any a...Interesting. I can apprciate this more than any astrology website. However, when I tried to use the tools to figure out my personality, I hit a bump on the sensors/intuitive options. On this I see parts of both sides that I do like knowledge of the past on the sensor side and possibilities for the future on the intuitive side. What then? I can't judge what if "best" since I know I do any of these options depending on the situation I'm in. <br /><br />The four result I get are ISTJ, ISFJ, INTJ, and INFJ. I see part of all of these I have but not all in one personality. Ihate to pick one for any bias I may have in making the decision (I may pick out what I want instead of how I am). johnsuttonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04548989640535234663noreply@blogger.com